I haven’t written anything of substance in my three blogs in
well over a year. It took this year’s election to finally shake my typin’ fingers
from their slumber. Only barely since this has been the most unbearable
slog of an election in memory. Four years ago we were treated to the
most entertaining and compelling one we’re likely to see for a long time. It
inspired me to compare it to
The
Big Lebowksi,
Dr.
Strangelove, and your
favorite
professional wrestlers. There’s no such fun this time around.
I must begin by saying that I am disappointed by the Obama
presidency. Not because I believed in Hope and Change
TM. I’m not
often naïve; I always knew there was a high probability of disappointment. Obama
was dealt the toughest of hands, but I feel strongly that he played it wrong.
He blew an opportunity that rarely comes along in American politics. From the
moment he took office, he looked to extend the olive branch to Republicans even
as they repeatedly knocked it from his hand and stomped it into pasta seasoning again and again. Even before inauguration, he went to
George Will’s house
to court every significant conservative columnist. He held similar court with
Republican members of congress even though they were the minority. All of that
outreach resulted in zero GOP votes for a stimulus package in the middle of the
worst economic situation the country had seen in almost 70 years, even after
the Democrats threw in extra tax cuts just to appease them. All of those open-armed gestures resulted in the Senate Minority Leader stating that his single most important goal in the midst of all these challenges was “making Barack Obama a one-term
president.”
When he chose how to treat those who got us into so much
trouble, he turned the other cheek. Obama did nothing to hold anyone
accountable for the economic disaster, despite the myriad of laws broken in the
financial sector. He let Dick Cheney, José Rodriguez, and their ilk completely off
the hook for the torture programs they devised, leading to a complete scumbag
like Rodriguez recently bragging about his “big boy pants” on 60 minutes. And
nothing was done about altering the illegal surveillance strategy employed by
the Bush administration. Hey, I get it. He didn’t want to lose his financial backing,
didn’t want to piss off the CIA right off the bat, and he figured he’d
better use everything in his arsenal to avoid any terrorist attack for which he’d
undoubtedly be pilloried.
When I say he missed an opportunity, it’s because instead of going straight to the public that elected him, he was too
busy trying to make nice with those who were dead set on destroying his
presidency with any available weaponry. In his nomination acceptance speech a
few months ago, he said “So you see, the election four years ago wasn't
about me. It was about you. My fellow citizens — you were the change.” This
statement is correct. But it took until this election for him to realize that
his energy would have been better spent with those same fellow citizens rather
than hoping to appease those who have declared him a sworn enemy. This is of
course 20/20 hindsight. I’m not saying Obama shouldn’t have tried outreach
first, and he would have been a hypocrite if he hadn’t. But why did it take so
long and so many useless peace offerings? The people were indeed ready for major
change for the first time since Richard Nixon. But Obama chose a different
strategy.
I am, generally speaking, a progressive. It’s not that I expected
him to be one. I just think he played the game wrong. Yet my disappointment
sells him short. He’s actually
gotten a whole lot done
despite the mess the country is in. And all this with an opposition party that
long ago stopped giving a damn about decency.
The shameless, craven behavior of the Republican Party absolutely
astonishes me. I suppose I was naïve about one thing. I thought they would take
Obama’s 365 electoral vote victory as a pretty clear sign that the will of the
people deserved acknowledgement. For instance, Obama had said if elected
he would fight to enact universal health care. He did so with a plan largely
devised by the right-wing Heritage Foundation and employed successfully by Mitt
Romney. But rather than helping craft a compromise Republicans chose to
lie their way into a battle
to the death panel (one that was eventually declared alive by their own Chief Justice Roberts). At that point it was clear that whatever Obama proposed, they would
be against, and with no qualms about outright lying to garner public support for
their side.
But this runs deeper than simply looking to score political
points. If these Republicans have shown us any governing principle it’s that they
do not think that factual truth is important. This certainly applies when
talking about Obama, but also on any relevant issue of the day. When presented
with clear evidence of anything,
today’s Republican Party prioritizes their beliefs over reality. Think about it.
According to the Republicans:
- ·
Climate change either doesn’t exist or is not
important.
- ·
Obama raised your taxes.
- ·
Voter Fraud is a tremendous problem.
- ·
Obama was born in Kenya.
- ·
Abstinence education reduces pregnancies.
- ·
Republicans are trying to protect social
security and Medicare.
- ·
Sarah Palin was against the Bridge to Nowhere.
- ·
Iraq was working with Al Qaeda.
- ·
Tax cuts on the wealthiest sector of the
population create economic growth for everyone.
All of the above is well proven bullshit.
Which brings us to President Obama’s opponent. From the
beginning of this campaign, it was clear that Mitt Romney was going negative. This
is America, and that’s his right. But during these last 40 weeks,
he has told lies on 891 occasions!
891!! That’s simply astonishing. OK, so maybe you don’t believe all of those
are actual lies and are open to some interpretation. Even if you want to be extremely
generous and take just 10% of them as untruths, that would still be more than two a week for
nearly a year. Nobody questions that Romney has told different audiences different
things at different times. To be fair, nobody has any idea what Romney would
look to do as president. I doubt he even really does. So there’s no reason to
trust him on just about anything, right?
Ah, but there has been a handful of areas where he’s
actually been consistent. He will increase military spending. He will cut
taxes, primarily on the wealthiest Americans. He will cut various public
service programs that benefit wide swaths of our fellow citizens in various
ways. Aside from also being consistently “pro Freedom,” that’s about it, man. In
the only executive decision he’s had to make since 2007, he selected Paul Ryan
as his running-mate. Ryan is a self-proclaimed “policy wonk” who can’t even
handle basic mathematics and devoutly worships at the altar of
voodoo economics. He
has also constantly lied about subjects important and banal, from whether he requested
stimulus funds to his marathon time. He is in so many ways today’s exemplary Republican.
Over the last 32 years, Republican Party policy has resulted
principally in Debt and Destruction
TM. We’ve seen unnecessary wars, unfunded
mandates, and
embarrassing
corruption
and
scandals.
This is what Republican Presidencies have meant. And most of these actions were
based on lies or false promises. George W. Bush stated again and again that he
was
against
nation building. We know how that turned out. He named his tax cuts “middle
class tax cuts” even though the majority of the reduction was for the
wealthiest. “Healthy forests” was a veiled giveaway to logging companies. “Clear
skies” reduced regulations on polluters. “Support the troops” meant support
George W. Bush’s war, but don’t provide any body armor or sufficient health care upon
return. And of course to dress every newsworthy wound we got terror alerts
that were designed to intimidate and distract us every time something went
wrong for the Bush White House. I question whether Americans really remember
what it was like with a Republican president. With good reason, we all wanted
to move on. But those who cannot remember their past are
doomed to repeat it.
Is there reason to think a Romney presidency will be a
departure from previous Republican policy and behavior? Lucky for us during the
second debate, a conscientious citizen actually asked him “What is the biggest
difference between you and George W. Bush, and how do you differentiate
yourself from George W. Bush?” I present Romney’s response in full:
“The —
President Bush and I are different people, and these are different times. And
that's why my five-point plan is so different than what he would have done. I
mean, for instance, we can now, by virtue of new technology, actually get all
the energy we need in North America without having to go to the — the Arabs or
the Venezuelans or anyone else. That wasn't true in his time. That's why my
policy starts with a very robust policy to get all that energy in North
America, become energy-secure.
Number two, trade. I'll crack down on China.
President Bush didn't. I'm also going to dramatically expand trade in Latin
America. It's been growing about 12 percent per year over a long period of
time. I want to add more free trade agreements so we have more trade.
Number three, I'm going to get us to a
balanced budget. President Bush didn't. President Obama was right. He said that
that was outrageous to have deficits as high as half a trillion dollars under
the Bush years. He was right. But then he put in place deficits twice that size
for every one of his four years, and his forecast for the next four years is more
deficits almost that large. So that's the next area I'm different than
President Bush.
And then let's take the last one, championing
small business. Our party has been focused on big business too long. I came
through small business. I understand how hard it is to start a small business.
That's why everything I'll do is designed to help small businesses grow and add
jobs. I want to keep their taxes down on small business. I want regulators to
see their job as encouraging small enterprise, not crushing it.
And the thing I find most troubling about
"Obamacare" — well, it's a long list, but one of the things I find
most troubling is that when you go out and talk to small businesses and ask
them what they think about it, they tell you it keeps them from hiring more
people.
My priority is jobs. I know how to make that
happen. And President Bush had a very different path for a very different time.
My path is designed in getting small businesses to grow and hire people”
In this moment Romney had a wonderful chance to say how his direction
would break the trend with Republican presidencies past. He took the
opportunity to attack Obama, China, and Venezuela, but didn’t reveal any
substantive way he would govern differently. This is because his few consistent
policies are nearly identical to Bush’s. And in fact most of his advisers come
directly from Bush’s administration.
I acknowledge that Obama hasn’t been perfect. I wish he
would have given up on his version of change for something more practical after
it simply wasn’t taking hold. At the very least, he’s an honest and honorable
guy. Maybe he isn’t wired to be a true leader, but he is perfectly suited to steer a
steady course. And right now that’s probably what we need more than anything.
The GOP has tried to redefine reality for decades. Yet given
what we can safely believe about Romney, we know these policies will only send
us farther backwards, bolstered by dishonest arguments the entire
way. Do we really want to reward a party that has so clearly proven that they will
never put the country ahead of their own agenda? A vote for Romney is a vote for
falsity and pettiness. And it is almost certainly a vote to return to the Bush
years. Given that threat, we must give Obama all the support we can.
When Obama was elected, I wrote “He’s got his work cut out
for him.” I didn’t realize that the Republican Party would make so much harder
than it had to be. If he is reelected, he will have another four years of
brutal fighting ahead of him. My hope for 2012 is that he’s been kicked in the
balls enough times to know he must come out swinging from here on out. Because
even if he wins 365 electoral votes, his opposition won’t suddenly value truth,
honor, or the needs of our country. As
an American who values all of these things, there’s no other available choice
in this election.
And just to show I'm not too much of a Debbie Downer, have a righteous jam by The Equals that's on topic enough: